Philippe Couillard - prime minister of Quebec - Yes we can mock from religion, law 59 - Canada is a free country and secular

YES- We can mock from religion, law 59

The Liberal bill against hate speech is not only unnecessary, it may be absolutely harmful.

Air Canada, daily

Philippe Couillard

Flight schedule to Riad Saudi Air Canada Montreal Trudeau (YUL) 9:30 p.m. in Frankfurt (FRA) finish 10:55

Lufthansa Frankfurt (FRA) Departure 12:55 to Riad, (RVH) arrival 3:10 p.m. local time.

Space for your brain 79 cm with two armrests Cost $ 1,762.00 in business class and friends will be waiting at the airport and do not forget your friends and families of Quebec, and some lawyers, special rates for groups

One who best demonstrated not  but Julius Grey Imam Salam Elmenyawi "You can insult me, but do not insult my  said religion,"the representative of the Muslim Council of Montreal in committee Thursday. The man claims that renders illegal to make fun of religions.

What an insult, anyway? A mockery-.

If that were the case, it would probably build new prisons to house the comedians  Or those who, convinced of the superiority of their religion or atheists, attacking the other

Bill 59 will not until then. But he intends to allow the Human Rights Commission for investigation of cases of hate speech or speech that incite violence. Offenders are liable to a minimum penalty of $ 1,000 and a maximum of $ 20,000 for a subsequent offense.

Yet publicly incite hatred, promote hatred against an "identifiable group" is already a two-year crime punishable Canadian prison. As this is an exception to freedom of expression, and as it is a crime, the evidence must be very strong case, very clear.

At the request  the Quebec of Human Rights Commission,concerned harassment in the internet, Couillard government wants to create an equivalent civil offense, which would make convictions easier.

Philippe Couillard is he the son of Machiavelli?

We guess that the complaints come from precisely people like Mr. Elmenyawi, do not tolerate teasing, ultra-sensitive to criticism people or people who would like is incorporated in the civil laws of the sacred principles of religion.

In a secular country, the state should not favor any religion and, in turn, individuals must accept a diversity of religious views - or nonreligious. This means accept unpleasant speech shocking, even hurtful. - Within the limits already established by law

The current limits are sufficient and I do not see why we would send to an already tangled commission on time with the task of making investigations matter for the police.

The bill goes on to say that if there is concern for "the life, health or safety of a person" of a group targeted by hate speech, the Commission can s 'address the court to stop these about.

Uh, excuse me? If someone's life is threatened by hate speech, it is urgent. And when there is an emergency, the last place is advised Rights Commission! There are police for that.

Criminal Code

exists in our Criminal Code a relic of the past which is called "blasphemous libel". This crime, punishable by up to two years imprisonment, targeted offenses against official churches  CANADA and QUEBEC. - Anglican or Catholic, Philippe Couillard

It fell into disuse, but in the first half of the twentieth century, it resulted in several lawsuits. Victor Sterry, an atheist Toronto member of the "Rationalist Society", was sentenced to two months in prison in 1927 for a text in which he ridiculed the religious beliefs and the Bible as superstitions fabrics.

We must reread outraged comments counsel for the prosecution, for which the whole society would collapse in a world without God, all crimes would be allowed, people would run naked in the streets, in short, there would be chaos, and to avoid this, we must imprison those who mock religion!

Philippe Couillard had the nerve to see the Pope Francis to say that Quebec is Catholic and that we share the same religious roots.

In Quebec, we can not count the number of lawsuits filed against Jehovah's Witnesses. The group was attacking in particular the Catholic religion and the alliance "unholy" of the Church with the political and economic power. They attacked Catholicism, priests, judges, etc. Most earned their trial, but sometimes after endless and wasteful procedures. The last took place in the 50s

it was at this time that the Supreme Court wrote, particularly for Maurice Duplessis, that "freedom of thought and speech and disagreement in ideas and beliefs, on every conceivable subject, are part of the essence of our  "This is

lives.a personal choice of being killed by her husband

This is why we need the least possible laws to vainly try to control all rude, uncivil, deeply stupid words - although, I admit, it's raining these days public

not only do we not need it, but we encourage the nervousness and susceptibility, two rather unhealthy stuff in  discourse..

Yes, in this country, we can even make fun of religion. The case is being heard for 75 years.

And in case you would not have noticed, freedom of religion and freedom of expression are side by side, glued-laminated in the same article of  Charter of theRights.As indissolubly married.

Failure to love passionately, they must learn to endure.

Mr. Philippe Couillard and his liberal family are they suffering from a rare disease called Islamic racist to Adil Charkaoui and prestigious Imams of the Quebec colony.

Speak there on both sides of the mouth at the same time? It should be the commentator for the television station "AMI" video description to one side of its jaws and captioning for the other side. We do not know if patriot Canadians and Quebecers or an undercover pro-religious exception in having as Catholicism-