What is a Toxic Quebecer? Re-election of the Liberal Party in Quebec the people

What is a toxic Québecer?

You can replace the word Québécois per Canadian, English, French, Arabic, etc. it is always the same.

A Quebec is the term used in politics to talk about serious memory problems can have repercussions in the daily operation of Quebecers.

These problems can cause forgetfulness, but also understanding of disorders, reasoning, judgment, language or decline, difficulties in identifying in time or in space and recognize the political parties that have stolen over us.  

What's wrong with a Quebecer?

The assessment is made ​​from a questionnaire, ie an election race Menat a crucial consideration, ie the elections. Journalists measures the cognitive abilities of Quebecers and assess the behavioral and functional impact of the new government. This disease affects us every day. Often the Québécois whining but is still happy. It is the top of its blinding glory. Every four years the Quebec takes a decision on the mood of the population. But it knows regardless of political party after a certain period they are all the same.

The Quebecers are a people friendly

Synonyms, affordable  accepting, accessible, admitting, affable, pleasant, approving the appointment, kind, learner rider, benevolent, cordial, listening, engaging, celebrating, gracious, accommodating, hospitable, binder, housing, offering, open, receiving, welcoming, helpful, friendly, good-natured,naive.   

We remove the crucifix in the National Assembly and we will replace the archaic religions. It should not be mistaken religions, power, money always have the same meaning is to you checked for their own interest.

Racist,male name

1meaning

moral contagion, passion for something [Immigrations, Religions Neanderthals, extremists, Muslim, Orthodox Jews, KKK, Taliban, the Muslim Brotherhood,etc.].Not wanting to integrate their newly adopted country. The new country has to change and leave him all the land for personal development at the expense of the majority asking for unreasonable accommodation.

Sens 2

Paralyzing the democratic system of a society to recreate the problems of his own country he left again for the same in another country. Everything is owed ​​to him and he knows how to use the word "racist". It makes use of the media, our politicians and Chartres of Rights and Freedoms on his own, because he knows in this country weaknesses.

Blind

Blind adjective

Sens 1Who is deprived of the use of sight. Blind synonym, English blind

Sens 2 Who lacksjudgment,foresight [Figuratively,Quebec].English blind

Sens 3Integer, uncritically. Eg A blind trust. "Is rejected himself" absolute Synonym. Englishblind

Are weduring the war of religions?

Yes, the weakness of Quebecers gives you the vision by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Canada's, but the origins of Quebec do not have rights, ie, is to say, reasonable accommodation because religion, habit, etc. We leave these criminal religion come to our country to destroy us. Laws can not do anything because these criminal with the help of some jurists use the courts against our people. We must thank the multiculturalism of Pierre Elliott Trudeau to have filled all Canadians by putting it in the Constitution of Canada. Providing the key to control of Rights and Freedoms of the Constitution in his Liberal coffin.

No government will not want to open the Pandora's coffin as politicians have a duty to sell the population the highest bidder. Religions dominate several countries in the world. Does Canada it be?  

Please enter what religionwin........................... or secular, democratic Canada but we are too low, we'll leave them instead.

Do not forget that there have been more deaths throughout history because of religion than any other conflict. Religion is certain person can educate to fight for the message of their religion and the most intelligent and educated people use religious naive for their own welfare   

Integration.Multiculturalism, it is nowhappening!

it is  France and several other countries

Le Figaro: by Guylain ChevrierFebruary 7, 2014

TRIBUNE - Following the announcement of the government's roadmap on integration, Guylain Chevrier, former member of HCI, denounced the religious patronage and communitarian drift government.

Guylain Chevrier, a member of the secular mission of the High Council for Integration (2010-2013), educator and social work lecturer at the university, Doctor of History.

The announcement of the Roadmap Government respecting the consolidation of integration sounds like the end of the principle of republican integration that defined public policy in this area for nearly 25 years. A roadmap on from the report submitted in December to the Prime Minister who had much attention, since proposed repeal of the law of 15 March 2004 banning conspicuous religious signs in public schools and secular. A turning point that turns radical, in the sense of a society leaning multicultural model.

"Everyone will be able to claim on behalf of the non-discrimination learning in the school of his native language. After Mandarin and Hindi, why not Bambara and Soninke?

"Whatis it? Creation of a Franco-Maghreb Youth Office that guides according to the origin of public action in breaking with the spirit of our institutions, while fueling positive discrimination; openness to competition populations (immigrants) who were excluded say with obligation of result (50% success in competitions), which plays in the same direction.

The questioning of a republican conception of the public service to which the employee's post is connected by adherence to republican values ​​that constitute nationality, membership is also the condition for access to the latter in the Civil Code; The principle of learning Arabic, Mandarin and Hindi as well as classical languages. Then why not Bambara or Soninke?

Everyone will be able to claim on behalf of the non-discrimination learning in the school of his native language. These courses will necessarily drain the students according to their origin or their religion.

It is the organization of the school break according to ethnic and religious divisions by the introduction of these languages, which had previously been avoid ... We add the reference to the introduction in the curriculum of the "unsung heroes in the history of France from immigrant" ... to give the impression that this will serve as a kind of spirit of justice through this promotion, to rehabilitate a supposedly mistreated and depreciated immigration, on how the general guilt. There is of course the names that could be retained in this state of mind, but to a lesser extent by the affirmative approach. Most of the proposals are going in the same direction with a few exceptions.

It is said in the comments on these proposals, want to do is join France which would move away. But this policy line is that of valuing differences from all angles that can only encourage to separate.

"There is still discrimination must be fought without trembling but which can not be shown as falling in France of the standard and aclimate of generalizedsegregation.

"It'samazing all the same whether at the time in Germany and in the UK there is the failure of multiculturalism in France, our Government has chosen such an orientation with serious consequences. Unless it is animated by areferred religious patronage from a political majority in big trouble, as risky and dangerous, and has nothing to do with the interests of society that is supposed to synthesize the state.

It was explained that the integration would not work for those from parents of foreign origin that "We forget in this analysis those who are not native French immigrant. We abandon them to their fate ...

"LetFrench or not. We take to witness the difficulties encountered by the social ladder to justify but actually a comparable social status, no longer works for the French raw. Immigrants and their children are only part of the inhabitants of sensitive urban areas and minority are still in the park of French social housing. In other words, in this analysis we forget those who are not native French immigrant.

We abandon them to their fate by suggesting that only those to attract the interest of the authorities designated as the victims of the risks of exclusion social or excluded are necessarily immigrants or children of immigrants. There is still discrimination must be fought without trembling but which can not be presented as belonging to France from the norm and a generalized climate of segregation.

The integration works!

On the other hand, the figures or trends in this field produced by all surveys, the Ministry of the Interior to INED show that integration works! If foreigners arriving on our soil often experiencing difficult living conditions, they feel much better than before their migration. It is true that thanks to the principle of equality that defines our Republic in its fundamental principles through which the integration is done, they have access to social goods of common law like everyone else, because we does not consider them different from others according to their origin, color or religion. Their unemployment rate is halved in 5 years and in parallel they are twice as likely to access social housing.

The acquisition of French nationality of foreign rose to go from 45,000 in 1995 to 110,000 in 2011. The performance children of immigrants are now comparable to that of other children the same social condition. The "acceptance of French society" indicator shows that the French company for thirty years is becoming more tolerant vis-à-vis foreigners and immigrants.

According to the TeO survey (Trajectories and Origins) of INED and INSEE, if immigrants fathers belonged to the low-skilled occupations, their son much easier access to skilled positions, from 62% to 74%. The son are more often in intermediate occupations, 22%, or frames, 9% to 7% and 4% for fathers.

As for the daughters of immigrants, they access intermediate occupations in amounts equivalent to those of son and especially successful in school, for which it is a vector of emancipation in many cultures where the patriarchal tradition has thick skin.

To justify this "reconstruction" of the integration policy makes it responsible for difficulties social promotion may encounter immigrants or their children, but in reality that concern the whole of society and is not intended to.

It is a fallacy to fold over a responsibility which is to look elsewhere, towards those whose politics continues to produce under-employment economy. When one wants to kill his dog is said to have rabies!

The republican integration problem is not from France, but now the growing trend, especially on the side of ourcompatriots, Muslimd a community separation, with a refusal to increasingly marked by extending the veil, refusing to mix beyond belief community. While precisely the spirit of our institutions is to consider first as equal to promote mixing and not confine the Community.

Secularism guarantees equal treatment for all and this requires a clear separation between the Churches and thestateprotects the common good and worn over differences. That way it protects the citizen against community pressures facing the free exercise of their rights.

This is what we will attack when encouraging as intends to make the current government, differences according to origin, culture or religion in all directions, by a policy of positive discrimination that turns ultimately radically back to the Republic.

In conclusion

Power over others is a wonderful drug in magic power. Money is not the purpose of this assessment but to know that the respondent must stoop to ask. Control of all leads Quebecers to be cynical of politics and became increasingly bitter, tart and unpleasant taste. The Quebecer has no confidence in its politicians and its institutions. Its individuals slowly seep through our institutions.

Wake up because it is almost too late for Canada through our politicians

as they will rien.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/societe/2014/02/07/31003-20140207ARTFIG00129-feuille-de-route-sur-l-integration-le-multiculturalisme-c-est-maintenant.php